A Blast from the Past

It’s not often these days there is much worthwhile on forums. Sawmillcreek is just one of the flavors, but in a decidedly fake egalitarian environment. That fakeness was to attract advertisers and the kind of traffic advertisers want. But, once in a while, there was some gold there.

I have a serious distaste for the forum for several reasons. One, it’s framed to look like it’s not for profit (with .org, and various “pens for soldiers” things, that the ownership gets surprisingly territorial about given that’s actually supposed to be a not for profit). You’ll find folks often willing to speak up if they mentioned any other pen charities on SMC or mentioned they couldn’t find where to send pens so they sent them to another one. They just won’t speak up on SMC. When you contribute, and especially in the past when people ran around everywhere with “please contribute” in their signature footers, you find your contribution goes to a for-profit entity, the forum owner’s sign company.

What set me off at the time was rudeness to George Wilson. George is the equivalent of running into a +7 (like below par average) golfer on a public golf course. Eventually, the shankers and wankers don’t want someone like that around, and they want to talk about some tip they learned and do it without someone who knows what they’re talking about squinting. If George said something in a definitive way, it drew heat. If he said something about one of the gurus, like Chris Schwarz, people would literally register or resurrect their old IDs to go there and try to get him in trouble. I suppose the unexposed person may not know the difference between carrying water for Schwarz and seeing a legitimate master who is selling nothing to anyone (unlike Schwarz, who is willing to sell you bloated price plans or get you to pay to see yet another iteration in his “the right way” sharpening nonsense).

Between that and the “everyones’ mileage varies” crap that was the norm there, and the fact that it appears to be a for profit site always complaining about people not giving enough to it, I was out. It sucks, at least in my opinion, and it’s pretty much dead as a doornail now.

But this is about XHP….

..and the fact that it’s V11 and so on, at least nominally by composition. It strikes me as even a little more interesting that the resident psychologist was so involved in this thread and later went on to tell everyone that it’s much the same as 10V or A11 is V11. These statements aren’t remotely close to true. The latter two are vanadium carbide steels and XHP is a high chromium carbide volume steel.

Lee Valley is an advertiser at SMC, which is why it’s odd that remains. All forums favor advertisers. SMC goes further by blocking out non-advertisers from answering questions from posters. I don’t think most posters know that, but more than one retailer or company person got a hold of me elsewhere and flatly stated that their IDs were ghosted because they wouldn’t sign on to advertise. The terms refer to it as a “non-competitive” advertising atmosphere. The slant there while I was posting in favor of Grizzly was humorous, but that was fortunately out of view in the hand tool section.

How did I get to posting about this? I still browse over there once in a while. I noticed yet another sharpening thread there browsing this morning very early morning, but it doesn’t have the same fervor it used to. It went from cold water to water bottle temperature, let alone to any smoke or fire, and quickly got to people who make one post a month threatening to leave. The same kind of people who would only make a post to complain about George. Notice there is useful information in the post I linked, but no such thing really appears at this point because people move on and there’s nothing attractive to bring a new Kees or Patrick Chase in, and both of those guys XRF-ed V11 to find that it was XHP. Someone else in the US mid-south also did the same thing.

One of the things that came up in the thread was that “the crystal structure of V11 is finer than older steels” or something along those lines, and “finer than O1 and A2”. I wonder why people believe this. Maybe it was said in ad copy or given as a platitude about powder steels. Powder metallurgy is fine. Very little of what’s made from it is as fine as the more plain ingot steels. The purpose of PM is to take something that makes a real turd of an ingot steel, like D2 or up from there, and spray out a zillion little tiny particle ingots so that the constituents don’t cool into gigantic apex killing poorly dispersed carbides. 154CM vs. CPM154 is a good example, but it goes up from there. XHP/V11 is “more” than D2 or 154CM, and 154CM is already as an ingot steel, something that will not even take an edge off of a stone without letting parts of its edge go. CPM 154, the powder version is kind of like XHP. Actually, PM D2, CPM 154 and XHP are sort of a family of increasing amounts of carbon and varying levels of chromium among them.

I found this old SMC thread because I googled “XHP micrograph grain boundary”. I didn’t find any grain boundary pictures. You can find pictures of XHP micrographs and compare them to O1 if you’d like and note how much finer O1 is. The discussion of what the micrographs tell you other than being able to see a much more coarse carbide structure in XHP is a little more nuanced, so we won’t get into it. But given XHP soaks in grain enlarging temperatures as part of its heat treatment process, I seriously doubt that the average grain size is less either. Important here if you’re not a steel person to see the carbides as kind of hard BBs and the grains as relative clods of compacted dirt, though the clods can be smaller than the BBs.

When I tested plane irons actually planing about 40,000 feet of wood in 2019, I came up with wear results about the same as the machine Kees made to abrade the steel. It sharpens more slowly than A2 or O1. This isn’t a surprise. We constantly hear about how it sharpens faster and is finer than other steels. Both of these are false.

I miss the days of useful information coming out of forums. To have a discussion like that on Reddit is gone. The woodworking psychologist may yet again forget about what XHP is and call it the same thing as some Vanadium high speed steel, but that’s just part of online life.

I know XHP and V11 are the same thing based on three people doing an XRF analysis, despite Lee Valley’s desire to try to keep the alloy secret after spending money on a picking and testing process. I’ll leave that there, because plenty of people think they invented an alloy or developed one. They can see this and correct me in writing if they are willing to do that. Woodworking companies don’t develop alloys, and XHP had enough positive press in the knife world that I think Lee Valley should’ve just said what it is and boasted about it.

So, I know it all?

No, I know a lot more now. I’ve tested a lot of stuff side by side, and I’ve found plenty of folks doing other ingot steels not that great and have been nonplussed.

In 2013, several years before this, I was totally on board with the newer stuff having to be better than the older. After all, that’s what we were told, we can analyze it, nobody can do things by hand unless they want to be grampy under the shade tree, and of course people were tortured and suffering in 1830, and they must’ve been dumb.

Except none of that’s really true. So it’s having come from that and getting my eyes opened a little bit. The first thing that opened my eyes was planing with a few irons and seeing the edges, and then planing with a butcher iron from around 1830 that was little used, and then seeing the most uniform spectacular even wear and what looked 10 times finer than anything in the new irons if chromium was involved. And finer than O1. I was stunned.

The thread on sawmillcreek has a little of every flavor. Old is always better all the way to “they were dumb and of course new is better” to the old engineering platitude “we could just always make it better”. I can’t really make tools better than Ward did, even if I cheat and use 26c3. And I’m using what someone may have made on a Tuesday afternoon at Ward, not my best weekend effort with a fresh head.

5 thoughts on “A Blast from the Past”

  1. The truth is that there’s a huge flurry of interest when something new and cool comes out. Is it as good as they say? Worse? Better? Then you have the gotta-have-it’s who never actually use anything… Then you have the nay-sayer sour-grapesters who poo-poo everything because it is not theirs. Eventually, enough signal exists such that people who are truly interested can cut through the noise and learn something. V11 has been out for ~ 10 years, A2 has been in woodworking tools for ~20. As such, the hype has died down.

    The thing is, what you are doing is interesting. It illustrates that the process of making is just as important if not more than the base metal. That’s not what the “cheaper at all costs” business fellows want, because it illustrates how cheapening methods and processes impairs results.

    You’ve thrown down a pretty heavy gauntlet with, “No, your product is trash because your process is out of whack.”

    It will be interesting to see if anybody responds by taking up the challenge to sort out their process and up their game.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. You’re exactly right. The seeming hand tool renaissance 15 years ago probably had more to do with people buying something they’d imagine using. LV and LN stopped releasing new tools of any substance, and the interest has waned. there’s an opportunity there for people to transition to making things, but I think imagining making things is more popular. it’s like a men’s nesting thing, which is a little weird, but I did it at the start, too.

      I haven’t got anything against the modern process of making tools (all CNC, contract everything out – like heat treatment, etc, and some of the small boutique makers contract out all kinds of stuff like the making of the actual parts of their tools, only assembling them). What gets me into what I’m doing is the false statement that “you can’t make anything good” on your own trusting your own eye and judgement, and that’s just not true. Even a piece of O1 bar stock of decent quality filed into shape and stuck in a handle will match most of what you can buy.

      As to why there isn’t more legitimate recreation of older English tools on the chisel an carving tool side, I don’t know. it’s not “undoable” but it may not be feasible in the absurd system we have now of wholesale being half or 2/3rds of retail and stuffing makers with the fiscal burden of people who return half of what they buy. I probably wouldn’t sell bench chisels for less than about $100 each the way I’m making them – were I to actually start doing that, but would be open over time to improving process without giving up the core important parts and bringing that down. that’s way in the future – but it could be done now.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Hi David,

    First I have to apologize this comment is not about the above post, but about the Uni method. You have stated clearly that you were sure some one had already been sharpening the uni-way for a long time, today, I witnessed first hand you were right.

    Jim, an older gentlemen who is 79 years old, has been a woodworker all his life since 16. Jim is kind enough to give me a small piece of sharpening stone and insists on showing me how to get a chisel razor sharp in his shop.

    At the beginning, nothing is special, he uses a 3/4″ firmer chisel with a hollow-grind bevel. Jim thinks spit is way better than oil on the stone; though I’ve heard old-timey woodworkers use spit, I was surprised by the amount of saliva needed, so much that would cover over half the stone and free flowing…He uses a circular motion to sharpen the secondary bevel on a very fine Arkansas stone, finishes the chisel on a Washita stone(I am no expert on the natural stones, I might be wrong). He then shaves his arm hair to prove the sharpness. At this stage, I am not impressed other than seeing live how to spit on a stone and watching saliva dripping on the side of it; then he gets very excited and tells me he can get the chisel to the next level sharp.

    There is a bench grinder with a very worn 4″ cotton wheel in it, might be 6″ at the beginning of the wheel’s life, he then put some white compound on the wheel and starts buffing. It is almost exactly like the uni-method! The same entry angle and pushes the chisel into the wheel, the only difference is Jim then polishes the first 1/3 of the chisel with a shallower angle and not using the side of wheel to get ride of the burr.

    He then spits on his arm again, shaves a great amount of hair off, and staring at me like saying “this is what sharp look like, watch and learn”; when asked about the uni-mothod, Jim says he has never heard of the name and he has been sharpening chisels this way since the 1960s.

    Sorry for the long reply that has nothing to do with the post, but I can not comment under the unicorn post and I think it is quite a fun experience and would like share it here, after all, it shows someone has been sharpening the uni-way for almost 60 years.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. that’s a great story! spit on an arkansas stone will mitigate the cutting power over time. I think in the days of stone oils being considered expensive – as it the days before the depression and then some after when people thought anything you could get for free was expensive if you didn’t do the free version – a lot of people spit on stones. probably the same folks would be resistant to buying a first quality black or trans stone that cost a day’s pay and a stone a cut below that level may be nicer if the spit moderates it and causes it to grade some (smooth over) and cut finer.

      George Wilson mentioned to me that one of the cabinetmaker masters at Wmsbg long ago was from continental europe, liked one of the american hone products or coticules (or both?) and spit on his stones and wouldn’t dream of anything else.

      As far as the buffer goes, I’ll bet not only does the method predate me by a very long time, but that we could find a version of it in text somewhere when you had to buy oxides and emery loose from a traveling supplier (like 200 years ago). it works so well and you can obviously find it out by accident (as I did) despite being told it’s against the rules of sharpening. And then start making parallels (straight razor stropping, and so on).

      Thanks for taking the time to relay the story.

      Like

      1. I am glad you like the story!

        Jim did mention his father was a master carpenter, it is very possible he learned the uni-way from his father and his father learned it from someone else, and it has been around way longer than 60 years, but only within the circle of local craftmen.

        I didn’t know spit has such effects on stones, it is indeed a smart and cheaper way to upgrade the stone and get a better edge. I’ve been using glycerol(from leftover old vaping e-juice) with good results recently, with somewhat better feedback from the stone, plus it has a higher viscosity than mineral oil, so more likely to stay on top of the stone than flowing off the sides.

        I had a feeling I could buy the Arkansas stone from Jim with the right offer, he is firm on keeping the Washita though, but with the fresh mental image of him sharpening on it, I was very hesitant to do so. Also I am glad the two vintage oil stones I bought have black oil residues all over them.

        Like

Leave a reply to D.W. Cancel reply